This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Tyrant said:Nibbles incident? Eccentric beatdown?
I did it.Tyrant said:Nibbles incident? Eccentric beatdown?
The Nibbles thing happened when Polarslam made his usual "Im N UR memorial laughin at ur sadness" posts and got banned. He already had four warning racked up anyway.Tyrant said:Nibbles incident? Eccentric beatdown?
I told you that I can't post a PM but I can summarize within the rules.
You are free to not believe me. Believe what you like.
Tamar knows exactly how to "summarize" a PM without breaking any rules.I told you that I can't post a PM but I can summarize within the rules.
Tyrant said:Pardon, but is this policy a recent addition? This seems to contradict something, somewhere, that I read earlier.
Wait a minute. WordInterrupted was banned from WF because of chat comments.
???
RJHJ said:You have to understand something about Wordfarm.
At night the pigs come out and write new rules on the barn door when everyone is sleeping.
Squealer aka Listkeeper is a master at making new rules up on the fly.
guldulac said:Yeah, I just caught that. There is something going on here, and it doesn't look too good.
Well, as I see it, we have about [STRIKE]three [/STRIKE] four options (ranging from simplest to most complex):guldulac said:The only justification for tolerating the rape of borgs was that borgs was, well, borgs. If Elwood is now acting with a similar lack of integrity (or at least those who act in his behalf), then we should not tolerate it.
Are you talking about this thread?And it took an even more interesting turn when the thread got locked up "because it was inappropriate, given the somber news we were all dealing with." (Paraphrased.)
The announcement was still under that one :wtf?:I kept my mouth shut at that point, because I hoped that the announcement's deletion was a sign that the matter was being reconsidered, but no. It was merely a sign that the matter was being swept as quietly as possible, under the rug
No. Initially that WASN'T the announcement that was there. Initially, the announcement was "I have decided to ban CheekyMonkey and GoldenEye permanently. I've made this decision because my personal information is too sensitive and cannot be revealed. This decision is final." (or words to that effect.)Lou The Beagle said:Are you talking about this thread?
http://www.wordforge.net/showthread.php?t=48967
I can't say I disagree about that thread being closed. Even with what was going on at the time, there were still a few wanting to foam up at the mouth and RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE about something that (to the rest of the board, including the staff) was just...so petty.
The announcement was still under that one :wtf?:
http://wordforge.net/announcement.php?f=2
Unless you're referring to something else. Not saying I don't believe you, but I'm a bit confused.
The announcement is still there. the one about Techman is above the first one. My computer's been fucked up for the last six months,Now the announcement linked to (at least when I click it) is about Techman's death. So is my computer acting up and other people see the other announcement, or was the announcement by Elwood about deciding to ban CM and GE deleted?
Markb said:Nobody has called you a liar. Listy yes, but not you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.